<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plain Text vs. Rich Text Format</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/</link>
	<description>self.blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 06:07:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Osborne</title>
		<link>http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Hi Debra,

Yep, I&#039;ll do a follow up post. But an early warning: If I hadn&#039;t had some experience using Subversion for programming and maintaining software configuration files, I probably wouldn&#039;t be using it. It&#039;s a bit over the top for most creative writing. On the other hand, as my friend Brent said, &quot;The process of writing books and developing software applications is almost identical.&quot; So in my opinion, why not use the same tools when they work for both? 

Plus, I find Subversion totally cool, even if I feel like an ueber-geek saying that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Debra,</p>
<p>Yep, I&#8217;ll do a follow up post. But an early warning: If I hadn&#8217;t had some experience using Subversion for programming and maintaining software configuration files, I probably wouldn&#8217;t be using it. It&#8217;s a bit over the top for most creative writing. On the other hand, as my friend Brent said, &#8220;The process of writing books and developing software applications is almost identical.&#8221; So in my opinion, why not use the same tools when they work for both? </p>
<p>Plus, I find Subversion totally cool, even if I feel like an ueber-geek saying that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra</title>
		<link>http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Wait, you use subversion to control your novel drafts.... you are going to do a follow up post on that, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, you use subversion to control your novel drafts&#8230;. you are going to do a follow up post on that, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Osborne</title>
		<link>http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Thank you Tom. It&#039;s fun to be part of a great community.

And the answer to your question of, &quot;What word processing software do I use?&quot;

I still use &lt;a href=&quot;http://openoffice.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OpenOffice.org Writer&lt;/a&gt;. While I like to keep the storage format of the content simple, nothing beats working in a good word processor like Writer, &lt;a href=&quot;http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Microsoft Word&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abisource.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Abiword&lt;/a&gt;, or many of the others out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Tom. It&#8217;s fun to be part of a great community.</p>
<p>And the answer to your question of, &#8220;What word processing software do I use?&#8221;</p>
<p>I still use <a href="http://openoffice.org" rel="nofollow">OpenOffice.org Writer</a>. While I like to keep the storage format of the content simple, nothing beats working in a good word processor like Writer, <a href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">Microsoft Word</a>, <a href="http://www.abisource.com/" rel="nofollow">Abiword</a>, or many of the others out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becoming A Writer Seriously &#187; TXT and RTF: Another Endorsement of the Durable Formats</title>
		<link>http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Becoming A Writer Seriously &#187; TXT and RTF: Another Endorsement of the Durable Formats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/#comment-394</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments discover fire &#187; Plain Text vs. Rich Text Format on In Praise of Rich Text Format -- the Universal Format for WritersJeremy Osborne on Best of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments discover fire &raquo; Plain Text vs. Rich Text Format on In Praise of Rich Text Format &#8212; the Universal Format for WritersJeremy Osborne on Best of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Colvin</title>
		<link>http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Colvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremyosborne.com/2007/12/17/plain-text-vs-rich-text-format/#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Of course, Jeremy, I agree whole-heartedly.  You&#039;ve made a very persuasive argument.  I&#039;m curious though:  what is your .txt program of choice?  RTF of choice?

I see too that the subversion program seems to be working for you.  Guess I&#039;ll have to check it out.

BTW, yr blog is getting famous. A friend emailed me about yr post, even before I got to it myself.

Tom

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, Jeremy, I agree whole-heartedly.  You&#8217;ve made a very persuasive argument.  I&#8217;m curious though:  what is your .txt program of choice?  RTF of choice?</p>
<p>I see too that the subversion program seems to be working for you.  Guess I&#8217;ll have to check it out.</p>
<p>BTW, yr blog is getting famous. A friend emailed me about yr post, even before I got to it myself.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
